52 in 52 Article Review: The risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with femoral venous catheter as compared to subclavian and internal jugular venous catheters

    NextPrevious

    52 in 52 Article Review: The risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with femoral venous catheter as compared to subclavian and internal jugular venous catheters

    Article Citation

    Marik PE, Flemmer M, Harrison W: The risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with femoral venous catheter as compared to subclavian and internal jugular venous catheters: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2012, 40: 2479-2485.

    Resident Reviewer

    Carl Mickman

    Why this study is important

    Placing central venous catheters in critically ill patients is one of the most common interventions made in the emergency department. While we don’t often see the complications of these interventions, understanding best practice for our patients can lead to improved outcomes and prevention of serious bloodstream infections later in our patients’ hospital courses.

    What we already know about the topic 

    Previous studies have shown that there is a significant increase in rates of infection for femoral central venous catheter vs internal jugular and subclavian placement. Because of the evidence in these prior studies, the CDC and the IDSA have made the recommendation level 1A in favor of avoiding femoral CVCs whenever possible.

    Brief overview of the study 

    The study is a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies that examined the frequency of bloodstream infections secondary to catheter placement between femoral, internal jugular and subclavian sites. Results from the studies were individually analyzed to determine the risk ratio for infection based on site of CVC placement, and these were further analyzed for heterogeneity of results, which would indicate a poor study design. Results showed that when the two studies with the greatest heterogeneity were excluded, there was no significant difference in the infection risk ratio between the three possible sites. There was also a correlation between the age of the study and the risk of infection in femoral placement (older studies had higher rates of infection).

    Limitations 

    The study was limited by several factors, including that there were only ten studies that qualified for inclusion. Meta-analyses are also intrinsically limited by the fact that the methods used in each individual study are not going to conducted exactly the same. Additionally, the fact that it was necessary to do statistical analyses in order to remove two of the studies to reach their conclusion that there was no difference is concerning.

    Take home points 

    Femoral central venous catheters may not have as much increased risk of infection as previously thought, and infections have decreased in recent years due to increased hospital precautions.

    Central Line-Associated Infection - With Text

    Central Line-Associated Infection – With Text

    Carl Mickman

    Carl Mickman

    Carl is originally from Minnesota and received his medical degree from LSU New Orleans. He completed residency at Mount Sinai, and will be staying on for the Ultrasound Fellowship. His primary academic interest is in bringing ultrasound technology to low-resource areas and has worked extensively in Haiti and Mozambique.

    More posts by Carl Mickman
    • Welcome! This is the website for the Mount Sinai Emergency Ultrasound Division. It serves as an information resource for residents, fellows, medical students and others seeking information about point-of-care ultrasound. There is a lot ofRead more

    • renal handling of water

      If you were on a tea & toast diet, how much water would you need to drink before you develop hyponatremia? I haven’t seen anyone work out the numbers before so here are my calculations. AndRead more

    • acute acidemia physiology

      As alluded to in the first post, don’t be fooled by a “normal” potassium in the setting of DKA because osmotic diuresis and H+/K+ exchange means that total body potassium is actually LOW. You all knowRead more

    • renal handling of potassium

      the first symptom of hyperkalemia is death Earlier post covered temporizing measures to counter hyperkalemia — namely, intracellular shift, increasing cardiac myocyte threshold potential. Give furosemide if the patient still urinates and consider dialysis, but then askRead more

    • bicarbonate revisited

      Previous post reviewed the safety of balanced crystalloids in hyper K. But what was up with serum bicarbonate decreasing with saline administration? This post introduces a new way of looking at the anion gap to possiblyRead more

    • hyperkalemia and balanced crystalloids

      Is it safe to give LR or plasmalyte to a hyperkalemic patient (these balanced crystalloids have 4-5 mEq/L K as opposed to 0 mEq/L K in normal saline)? Postponing the discussion of renal handling of potassium toRead more

    • hyperkalemia physiology

      You’ll likely encounter hyperkalemia on your next Resus / Cardiac shift, and you’ll instinctively treat it. But take a moment to review the fascinating physiology behind the “cocktail”! First, consider how K+ is buffered byRead more

    • Slow down your tachycardia (but not really)

      You’re sitting in resus bemoaning the departure of your most beloved attending when suddenly a patient wheels in without warning. The patient looks relatively stable but the triage RN tells you her heart rate wasRead more

    • Otitis externa: use the ear wick!

      Acute otitis externa (AOE) is a common complaint seen in pediatric as well as adult emergency departments. AOE is typically not accompanied by acute otitis media, although concurrent cases are possible. Also called “swimmer’s ear”Read more

    NextPrevious