Your guide to steroids in septic shock

    NextPrevious

    Your guide to steroids in septic shock

    Ok, so you know there is controversy in the use of steroids in septic shock, but what does the data actually support in terms of when you should and should not use them — here is a guide!

    Don’t want to read more? Here is the jist: Steroids (hydrocortisone <400mg/day) may reduce time in shock for patients with severe septic shock (sBP<90 after 1 hr of pressors + IVF). No evidence for mortality benefit. No evidence in other septic shock patients.

    Why might steroids work? In the setting of critical illness, the hypothalamus secrets CRH (cortisol releasing hormone) to increase cortisol and maintain a sympathetic response. Several factors influence a positive feedback loop to maintain a high level of cortisol. There is reduced cortisol breakdown, reduced excretion, increased receptor affinity and diminished protein binding. In the setting of relative adrenal insufficiency, the body cannot meet the demands for cortisol, which can result in refractory shock. Therefore, in some patients, steroids may help refractory shock.

    Is there a mortality benefit? No. The majority of studies do not show a mortality benefit to steroids in septic shock.

    Is there any benefit? In patients with severe septic shock (defined as continued hemodynamic instability (sBP<90 after adequate fluid resuscitation and 1 hour of pressors) steroids could decrease the duration of shock.

    What are the risks of steroids? Although there is fear steroids could worsen bacterial superinfection, there is no data that supports this. Steroids do cause hyperglycemia.

    Is there a way to test for adrenal insufficiency? Long story short: No. Testing is not reliable in critically ill patients.

    • Welcome! This is the website for the Mount Sinai Emergency Ultrasound Division. It serves as an information resource for residents, fellows, medical students and others seeking information about point-of-care ultrasound. There is a lot ofRead more

    • Difficult placement of an OGT? Try an ET tube introducer

      Tl;dr: Failed OGT placement in an intubated patient is common. Try using an 8.0 ETT as an introducer into the esophagus to prevent coiling in the mouth / upper esophagus.   Placement of an OGTRead more

    • Applying the Pelvic Binder: Pearls and Pitfalls

      Tl;dr: (1) Never rock the pelvis. Firmly squeeze and hold. (2) Consider quickly assessing for rectal or vaginal bleeding prior to binder application as this would suggest an open fx into the vag / rectalRead more

    • Don’t Be Rash

      Do you ever have a patient with a rash you just don’t recognize?  If you’re like me, it happens all the time and it can be hard to organize your differential.  Michelle Lin (https://aliemcards.com/cards/rash-unknown) published a greatRead more

    • Buprenorphine Band Wagon

      Do you know David Cisewski?  He’s incredible and he’s written an incredible review on buprenorphine (http://www.emdocs.net/buprenorphine-where-do-we-stand/) that I’d like to tell you all about. Buprenorphine marketed as Suboxone (but soon to be generic) is a mu-opioid receptor partialRead more

    • Ultrasound and Found

      Ultrasound for kidney stone has always been confusing.  If we do the ultrasound and find no hydro, don’t we need the CT to rule an alternate diagnosis?  If we do the ultrasound and find hydro, don’t weRead more

    • Old Graft? New friend!

      ESRD patients are typically “hard sticks.”   The arm with the fistula is typically off limits (unless in emergency settings) and the other arm is either difficult to access or occasionally has an old fistula. ThisRead more

    • The Supraclavicular Subclavian

      Traditionally, central line placement in the subclavian vein (SCV) involves a landmark-based approach in which the needle is guided under the clavicle. For the U/S lovers, there is an alternative approach to the subclavian inRead more

    • Paper Review: Are we hurting patients via oxygen supplementation?

      Bottom line up front: A recent large, high quality meta-analysis reported a significant mortality effect with the use of liberal, rather than conservative, oxygen supplementation. The number needed harm for 30-day mortality was 1 inRead more

    NextPrevious