Hurry Up & RUSH!

    NextPrevious

    Hurry Up & RUSH!

    You’re working in RESUS, and you get a notification for hypotension.

    He’s a 65 year old male noted to be hypotensive to 70/40 by EMS. On arrival, he’s altered and unable to provide any history, and EMS doesn’t have much more information. You don’t see any signs of trauma.

    Your attending suggests performing a RUSH exam to help narrow down your differential.  

    The RUSH (rapid ultrasound for shock and hypotension) exam is a fairly new concept, developed in effort to rapidly evaluate the undifferentiated hypotensive patient.

    Think of the RUSH exam for critically ill medical patients (hypotensive, signs of shock) as the equivalent of the FAST on your trauma patients.

    Here’s a nice graphic from EMCrit of your typical views:

     

    And there’s a great pneumonic (also from EMCrit) to help remember this (especially since this is your end goal):

    HI-MAP

    HEART: look for a pericardial effusion/tamponade, RV strain (PE?), LV function (cardiogenic sources)

    IVC: evaluate the volume status and guide your fluid resuscitation decisions

    Morrison’s/FAST: You know what to do! This will help you assess for things like a ruptured ectopic, massive ascites, spontaneous ruptured AAA, perforated viscus.

    AORTA: AAA–4 views (just below heart, suprarenal, infrarenal, just before bifurcation)

    PTX: r/o tension

    So next time you’re in either Resus or the Cardiac room with a hypotensive patient, grab the ultrasound and start RUSH-ing!

    Shout out to Dr. Moira Carroll for inspiring this post!

    SOURCES:

    https://emcrit.org/rush-exam/original-rush-article/

    https://emcrit.org/rush-exam/ <<< you’ll note some familiar names!

    • Welcome! This is the website for the Mount Sinai Emergency Ultrasound Division. It serves as an information resource for residents, fellows, medical students and others seeking information about point-of-care ultrasound. There is a lot ofRead more

    • Bag Mask Ventilation During Intubation

      A few days ago NEJM published the results of an investigation with profound implications for our specialty.  A group of intensivists and anesthesiologists conducted a multicenter, randomized trial conducted in seven ICUs to study theRead more

    • Gastric Emptying for Acute Poisonings

      At the request of department leadership, we will be revisiting methods of gastric decontamination for today’s pearl.  Two methods in particular. Ipecac-induced emesis and gastric lavage are two procedures that we read about in medicalRead more

    • Pacemakers Review pt. 3

      Today we will review complications associated w/ implanted pacemakers that you may encounter in the ED and thus ought to be familiar with. Generally, complications can be divided into two categories: early vs. late EarlyRead more

    • Pacemakers Review Pt. 2

      Cardiac pacing as an intervention can be conceptualized as addressing problems in electrophysiological conduction and/or.  So, for example, if there is a disruption in the electrical continuity between the atrium and the ventricle, a pacerRead more

    • Pacemakers Review Pt. 1

      The pursuit of mastery over cardiovascular emergencies demands a rough familiarity with implanted devices which includes why they get implanted in the first place (indications), how they work, how they malfunction, and how they affectRead more

    • In honor of a rosh review question that I got wrong, lets review Lyme disease!   Lyme disease is caused by the spirochete Boriella burgdorferi, transmitted to humans through tick bites from ixodes ticks. Location:Read more

    • NGT INSERTION

      Your patient has an SBO and has repeated bilious emesis on the side. The surgery team is in the OR and they ask if you can place the nasogastric tube (NGT). Lets review proper NGTRead more

    • No, that’s not an olive. That’s Pyloric Stenosis!

      Inspired by what appears to have been a very interesting day in the Peds ED, lets review a rare but interesting pediatric entity: PYLORIC STENOSIS Background: MC in Males (5:1) & firstborn children (30%) UsuallyRead more

    NextPrevious