Mechanical Ventilation Protocol in the ED

    NextPrevious

    Mechanical Ventilation Protocol in the ED

    Citation

    Fuller BM, Ferguson IT, Mohr NM, et al. Lung-Protective Ventilation Initiated in the Emergency Department (LOV-ED): A Quasi-Experimental, Before-After Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;

    Clinical Question
    Does a multifaceted, 4-part, ED-based mechanical ventilator protocol improve respiratory and ventilator-associated outcomes?

    The Short Version:

    Using a mechanical ventilation protocol (i.e., protective tidal volumes, appropriate PEEP, low FiO2, and elevating HOB) post-intubation in the ED has beneficial effects in the patient’s downstream hospital course.

    The Long Version:

    Design
    Before-and-after study with a preintervention period followed by a prospective intervention period.

    Setting
    The study was conducted in the ED (intervention) and ICUs (pertinent data and outcomes assessment) of an academic, tertiary medical center.

    Population
    The preintervention group consisted of consecutive, mechanically ventilated patients in the ED identified by validated electronic query method. The intervention group was followed and enrolled consecutively. Propensity score-matched cohorts of 490 patients in each group were compared.

    Intervention
    Multifaceted ED-based 4-part mechanical ventilator protocol targeting
    – lung-protective tidal volume
    – appropriate setting of positive end-expiratory pressure
    – rapid oxygen weaning
    – head-of-bed elevation

    Control
    Propensity score matched cohort

    Outcome
    Primary outcome was the composite incidence of respiratory distress syndrome and ventilator-associated conditions; secondary outcomes were ventilator-free days, ICU-free days, hospital free days, and mortality. The composite outcome decreased after protocol implementation (14.5% to 7.4%). Mortality also decreased after protocol implementation (34.1% to 19.6%). Propensity score-matched analysis showed absolute risk reduction for the primary outcome of 7.1% (aOR 0.47;95%CI 0.31-0.71). Secondary outcomes of mortality (aOR 0.47;95%CI 0.35-0.63) and ventilator-free days (aOR 3.69; 95%CI 2.30-5.07) were improved.

    Conclusion
    Although outcome improvement caused by factors other than the intervention cannot be excluded, these data support the feasibility and potential efficacy of a 4-part lung-protective mechanical ventilation protocol for emergency department patients.

    Strengths
    This pragmatic trial performed a realistic and straightforward intervention. The data behind the 4-part intervention protocol is supported by prior research in line with standard of care. Acute respiratory distress syndrome was adjudicated by blinded assessments.

    Weaknesses
    Causation between protocol and outcomes cannot be proven given possible improved overall care during intervention period. The primary outcome was a composite outcome which tends to equate the two component outcomes. After the propensity score matching, there was still a significant difference between the two study groups with dialysis dependence and those intubated as a result of congestive heart failure or pulmonary edema.

    • Welcome! This is the website for the Mount Sinai Emergency Ultrasound Division. It serves as an information resource for residents, fellows, medical students and others seeking information about point-of-care ultrasound. There is a lot ofRead more

    • renal handling of water

      If you were on a tea & toast diet, how much water would you need to drink before you develop hyponatremia? I haven’t seen anyone work out the numbers before so here are my calculations. AndRead more

    • acute acidemia physiology

      As alluded to in the first post, don’t be fooled by a “normal” potassium in the setting of DKA because osmotic diuresis and H+/K+ exchange means that total body potassium is actually LOW. You all knowRead more

    • renal handling of potassium

      the first symptom of hyperkalemia is death Earlier post covered temporizing measures to counter hyperkalemia — namely, intracellular shift, increasing cardiac myocyte threshold potential. Give furosemide if the patient still urinates and consider dialysis, but then askRead more

    • bicarbonate revisited

      Previous post reviewed the safety of balanced crystalloids in hyper K. But what was up with serum bicarbonate decreasing with saline administration? This post introduces a new way of looking at the anion gap to possiblyRead more

    • hyperkalemia and balanced crystalloids

      Is it safe to give LR or plasmalyte to a hyperkalemic patient (these balanced crystalloids have 4-5 mEq/L K as opposed to 0 mEq/L K in normal saline)? Postponing the discussion of renal handling of potassium toRead more

    • hyperkalemia physiology

      You’ll likely encounter hyperkalemia on your next Resus / Cardiac shift, and you’ll instinctively treat it. But take a moment to review the fascinating physiology behind the “cocktail”! First, consider how K+ is buffered byRead more

    • Slow down your tachycardia (but not really)

      You’re sitting in resus bemoaning the departure of your most beloved attending when suddenly a patient wheels in without warning. The patient looks relatively stable but the triage RN tells you her heart rate wasRead more

    • Otitis externa: use the ear wick!

      Acute otitis externa (AOE) is a common complaint seen in pediatric as well as adult emergency departments. AOE is typically not accompanied by acute otitis media, although concurrent cases are possible. Also called “swimmer’s ear”Read more

    NextPrevious