How Safe is Mechanical CPR?


    How Safe is Mechanical CPR?

    Question – How safe is mechanical CPR compared to manual CPR?

    There are two devices used for mechanical CPR – the AutoPulse and LUCAS – neither of which has been demonstrated to show a survival benefit over manual CPR in recent studies (CIRC, LINC, PARAMEDIC). Could these devices be causing more injuries compared to manual compressions? Enter a recently published study from the European Heart Journal.

    Koster et al. 2017* was a noninferiority safety study that randomized patients to the Autopulse, Lucas or manual compressions.

    Population – patients with either in-hospital cardiac arrest or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest that received manual CPR in the ED. Patients were recruited from Nov 2008-May 2014. Exclusion criteria included traumatic etiology, pediatric patients, patients that already had a mechanical compression device applied by ALS crew, ROSC before application of device.

    Intervention – Mechanical CPR

    Comparison – Manual CPR

    Outcome – serious injuries (visceral organs, large vessels, vertebrae) as assessed blind by post-mortem CT, autopsy or clinical course. These injuries were classified into 3 categories:

    • 1) life-threatening (expected to interfere with cardiac or respiratory function, or exsanguination > 800 mL)
    • 2) serious – injury would require repair or would be expected to prolong hospitalization
    • 3) insignificant

    Results: Autopulse (n=115), LUCAS (n=122), Manual Control (n=137)

    • The LUCAS device had similar rates of life-threatening or serious visceral damage compared to manual CPR (7.4% vs 6.3% respectively). There was a trend toward more life-threatening or serious outcomes with the use of the Autopulse (11.7%) but this was not significant. Some of these injuries included pneumothorax, pulmonary contusion, liver rupture, air embolism.
    • 3 patients had death attributable to the resuscitation itself. Two patients with the LUCAS had liver rupture with massive hemorrhage, and there was one AutoPulse patient found to have a tension PTX + air embolism.
    • Most did not survive resuscitation (Autopulse: 62.6%, LUCAS 65.6%, Manual CPR 50.4%), and more of the manual CPR group (49.6%) were admitted to the ICU after resuscitation. The study was underpowered to study survival, so no P values were given.

    Conclusions – Mechanical CPR was not more likely to produce significant injuries when compared to manual CPR. There was a trend toward more significant injuries with the use of AutoPulse.

    *Primary Author received funding from Physio-Control (Creator of LUCAS) and Zoll-Medical (Creator of AutoPulse).


    1. Koster et. al 2017 – Safety of Mechanical Chest Compression Devices AutoPulse and LUCAS in cardiac arrest: a randomized clinical trial for non-inferiority
    • Welcome! This is the website for the Mount Sinai Emergency Ultrasound Division. It serves as an information resource for residents, fellows, medical students and others seeking information about point-of-care ultrasound. There is a lot ofRead more

    • renal handling of water

      If you were on a tea & toast diet, how much water would you need to drink before you develop hyponatremia? I haven’t seen anyone work out the numbers before so here are my calculations. AndRead more

    • acute acidemia physiology

      As alluded to in the first post, don’t be fooled by a “normal” potassium in the setting of DKA because osmotic diuresis and H+/K+ exchange means that total body potassium is actually LOW. You all knowRead more

    • renal handling of potassium

      the first symptom of hyperkalemia is death Earlier post covered temporizing measures to counter hyperkalemia — namely, intracellular shift, increasing cardiac myocyte threshold potential. Give furosemide if the patient still urinates and consider dialysis, but then askRead more

    • bicarbonate revisited

      Previous post reviewed the safety of balanced crystalloids in hyper K. But what was up with serum bicarbonate decreasing with saline administration? This post introduces a new way of looking at the anion gap to possiblyRead more

    • hyperkalemia and balanced crystalloids

      Is it safe to give LR or plasmalyte to a hyperkalemic patient (these balanced crystalloids have 4-5 mEq/L K as opposed to 0 mEq/L K in normal saline)? Postponing the discussion of renal handling of potassium toRead more

    • hyperkalemia physiology

      You’ll likely encounter hyperkalemia on your next Resus / Cardiac shift, and you’ll instinctively treat it. But take a moment to review the fascinating physiology behind the “cocktail”! First, consider how K+ is buffered byRead more

    • Slow down your tachycardia (but not really)

      You’re sitting in resus bemoaning the departure of your most beloved attending when suddenly a patient wheels in without warning. The patient looks relatively stable but the triage RN tells you her heart rate wasRead more

    • Otitis externa: use the ear wick!

      Acute otitis externa (AOE) is a common complaint seen in pediatric as well as adult emergency departments. AOE is typically not accompanied by acute otitis media, although concurrent cases are possible. Also called “swimmer’s ear”Read more