How Safe is Mechanical CPR?


    How Safe is Mechanical CPR?

    Question – How safe is mechanical CPR compared to manual CPR?

    There are two devices used for mechanical CPR – the AutoPulse and LUCAS – neither of which has been demonstrated to show a survival benefit over manual CPR in recent studies (CIRC, LINC, PARAMEDIC). Could these devices be causing more injuries compared to manual compressions? Enter a recently published study from the European Heart Journal.

    Koster et al. 2017* was a noninferiority safety study that randomized patients to the Autopulse, Lucas or manual compressions.

    Population – patients with either in-hospital cardiac arrest or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest that received manual CPR in the ED. Patients were recruited from Nov 2008-May 2014. Exclusion criteria included traumatic etiology, pediatric patients, patients that already had a mechanical compression device applied by ALS crew, ROSC before application of device.

    Intervention – Mechanical CPR

    Comparison – Manual CPR

    Outcome – serious injuries (visceral organs, large vessels, vertebrae) as assessed blind by post-mortem CT, autopsy or clinical course. These injuries were classified into 3 categories:

    • 1) life-threatening (expected to interfere with cardiac or respiratory function, or exsanguination > 800 mL)
    • 2) serious – injury would require repair or would be expected to prolong hospitalization
    • 3) insignificant

    Results: Autopulse (n=115), LUCAS (n=122), Manual Control (n=137)

    • The LUCAS device had similar rates of life-threatening or serious visceral damage compared to manual CPR (7.4% vs 6.3% respectively). There was a trend toward more life-threatening or serious outcomes with the use of the Autopulse (11.7%) but this was not significant. Some of these injuries included pneumothorax, pulmonary contusion, liver rupture, air embolism.
    • 3 patients had death attributable to the resuscitation itself. Two patients with the LUCAS had liver rupture with massive hemorrhage, and there was one AutoPulse patient found to have a tension PTX + air embolism.
    • Most did not survive resuscitation (Autopulse: 62.6%, LUCAS 65.6%, Manual CPR 50.4%), and more of the manual CPR group (49.6%) were admitted to the ICU after resuscitation. The study was underpowered to study survival, so no P values were given.

    Conclusions – Mechanical CPR was not more likely to produce significant injuries when compared to manual CPR. There was a trend toward more significant injuries with the use of AutoPulse.

    *Primary Author received funding from Physio-Control (Creator of LUCAS) and Zoll-Medical (Creator of AutoPulse).


    1. Koster et. al 2017 – Safety of Mechanical Chest Compression Devices AutoPulse and LUCAS in cardiac arrest: a randomized clinical trial for non-inferiority
    • Welcome! This is the website for the Mount Sinai Emergency Ultrasound Division. It serves as an information resource for residents, fellows, medical students and others seeking information about point-of-care ultrasound. There is a lot ofRead more

    • Put down that FOBT

      “The HgB has dropped, have you checked a guaic?” How many times have you checked a FOBT in your workup for anemia? Let’s take a look at what FOBT is supposed to be used for. FOBTRead more

    • A ‘normal’ chest Xray

      What do you see when you take a look at this Chest radiograph? It isn’t immediately noticeable (and was read as normal), and is a good reminder of why you should always check your ownRead more

    • Overshot that INR

      There have been a few cases of supra-therapeutic INR in the Sinai ED recently, and at the request of one of our superstar interns, below you will find a brief set of recommendations regarding SupratherapeuticRead more

    • Ketamine PSA with Desaturation

      During a busy day in the ED, it becomes apparent that the pulling and yanking on your patient’s shoulder has done absolutely nothing to reduce their shoulder. You perform your pre-procedure PSA Checklist, know that thisRead more

    • Sinusitis In Pediatrics?

      You’re working in pediatrics, when a mother comes in stating her 5 year old has sinusitis. He presents with fever, cough, runny nose, and some discomfort over where his frontal sinuses are. Does he haveRead more

    • Ring Removal

      Over the past week, we’ve had a strange uptick in number of patients presenting to the ER with rings stuck on their finger. This is a quick review on the options that you have regardingRead more

    • TPA For Minor Stroke?

        So, you’re working in the ED when a new stroke code is activated. You walk over and see a young gentleman with the complaint of left facial tingling, right arm and leg weakness withRead more

    • Central Line Wizardry

      I was scrolling through twitter this morning when I came across a quick video from @CriticalCareNow for an awesome central line trick. And then I went to his feed and found some more. They areRead more