Gastric Emptying for Acute Poisonings

    NextPrevious

    Gastric Emptying for Acute Poisonings

    At the request of department leadership, we will be revisiting methods of gastric decontamination for today’s pearl.  Two methods in particular.

    Ipecac-induced emesis and gastric lavage are two procedures that we read about in medical school and in textbooks but never utilize in practice.  They are both considered techniques of “gastric emptying” (GE) as opposed to whole bowel irrigation or activated charcoal.  Although both were formerly widespread modalities for the management of ingested poisons, support for these techniques has waned over the last twenty years.  We’ll take a look at some of the evidence, but first let’s review some terminology.

    Gastric lavage (GL) refers to the passage of a large bore orogastric tube followed by repetitive instillation and aspiration of fluid in order to dissolve and retrieve pill fragments or other toxins from within the stomach.  Often referred to as “stomach pumping.”

    Syrup of ipecac is a once widely used drug to rapidly induced emesis for the management of acute poisoning.  Referred to in JAMA as “the treatment of choice in managing acute poisonings” in 1960, it was once a mainstay of prehospital and emergency department protocols.  However, it is no longer recommended.  Syrup of ipecac is commercially prepared from the roots and rhizomes of the Carapichea ipecacuanha plant.

    Tandberg et al. performed a controlled study in 1986 comparing the efficacy of the two.  The investigators administered 25 100ug tablets of tagged-Vit B12 to 18 fasting normal subjects.  The mean rate of recovery of the ingested tracer with ipecac-induced emesis was only 28%, whereas gastric lavage resulted in retrieval of 45% (paired t-test, P < 0.005). In this study, carefully performed gastric lavage was the more effective method of gastric evacuation.

    In 1990, Underhill et al. compared lavage, ipecac, and activated charcoal in Tylenol overdose.  Patients aged 16 and over who had ingested 5 gms or more of paracetamol within 4 h of admission were entered into the trial.  The mean percentage fall in serum acetaminophen level was 39.3% for gastric lavage and 40.7% for ipecac, with a significant difference between the treatment methods (p = 0.03).

    Pond et al. looked at gastric emptying as an adjunct to activated charcoal in 876 emergency department acute poisonings and found no significant difference when either syrup of ipecac or gastric lavage was added to activated charcoal protocols.  The authors concluded, in 1995, that “gastric emptying can be omitted from the treatment protocol for adults after acute oral overdose.”

    The complications of gastric lavage merit serious consideration.  They include aspiration pneumonia, esophageal perforation, laryngospasm, hypoxia, and/or fluid or electrolyte imbalance.  For these reasons, contraindications include unprotected airway, caustic ingestion (due to risk of exacerbating any esophageal injury), hydrocarbon ingestion (high aspiration risk), and/or patients at high risk for GI hemorrhage or perforation.

    Ultimately, The American Association of Poison Centers (AAPC) and the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists (EAPCCT) issued a joint statement discouraging the routine use of gastric lavage in the management of poisoned patients.  It is generally acknowledged that in the rare circumstance of a both recent (<1 hr) and lethal ingestion of a drug not adsorbed by charcoal, gastric emptying by means of lavage may be considered.  Syrup of ipecac, however, should remain abandoned to the archival record.

    • Welcome! This is the website for the Mount Sinai Emergency Ultrasound Division. It serves as an information resource for residents, fellows, medical students and others seeking information about point-of-care ultrasound. There is a lot ofRead more

    • E-point Septal Separation in the Patient with Congestive Heart Failure

      Perhaps never explained so clearly, Cisewki and Alerhand’s article on EPSS is a wonderful read. Bottom line to remember: EPSS > 7 mm was 87% sensitive and 75% specific at identifying reduced EF (<50%).  This isRead more

    • Lidocaine for cough?

      Whether it’s asthma, a U.R.I., or post nasal drip as the cause, cough is a common enough complaint encountered by emergency physicians everywhere. Of course you must always rule out the dangerous causes of coughRead more

    • Measles redux!

      A quick search of sinaiem.org for the keyword measles brings up a solitary post from 2015, and it’s not actually about measles. With all the attention that measles has been getting in the news recently,Read more

    • The Apple Watch Heart Study

      Disclosure: I’m a huge Apple Fan. Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you’ve heard about the Apple watch, many of you reading this are wearing one right now. On April 24th, 2015 it joinedRead more

    • Peritonsillar Abscess I&D…Can you ditch the endocavitary probe?

      Today’s post is inspired by real-life events and comes with a video (consent given by the patient and providers). The case: 29M presents with dysphonia, odynophagia, and drooling. He is hypertensive, with a low-grade fever,Read more

    • Look into my seeing EYE ball

      THE EYE EXAM Keep it basic… APD Intra-ocular Pressures: Tono-pen v Applanator (Goldmann) Visual Acuity or be a Slit Lamp KWEEN Move outside in: Lids → Eyeball Lids: ducts, eyelashes, orbital lesions or findings EYE:Read more

    • Oh no baby WHAT IS U DOIN’?

      Neonatal Resuscitation. (Some descriptors for reference: Terrifying. Scary. Fear-inducing. Horrific. Chilling.) But fear not! Your TR pearl today is brought to you by the NICU rotation + Jillian Nickerson/T.Webb doing some excellent preparatory work for/withRead more

    • Amanita Muscaria

      For those of you who remember Super Mario Bros… how awesome was it to gobble up that red and white mushroom gliding along the ground and get huge for a few seconds? The result of consuming thisRead more

    NextPrevious