Don’t put that peanut in your nose, honey!

    NextPrevious

    Don’t put that peanut in your nose, honey!

    Here is a pearl about nasal foreign bodies:

     

    The nose is the MC site of fb insertion, seen mostly in children <5 years. Most of the time, the risk of aspiration and complications are low. However, if the fb is a button battery or a set of paired disc magnets, the risks can be more significant. Generally you should know if the object is animal, vegetable, mineral, or toy prior to removal. Sometimes, it is impossible to know.

     

    Symptoms of nasal foreign bodies include:

    Mouth breathing

    Unilateral malodorous purulent discharge

    Epistaxis

    Sinusitis refractory to antibiotics

     

    Treatment methods include:

     

    Negative pressure – suction catheter technique

     

    “Mothers kiss” which involves a parent insufflating a short burst of air into the child’s mouth while occluding the unaffected nares.

     

    High pressure air through suction tubing – new technique detailed via ACEP: https://www.acepnow.com/article/perform-positive-pressure-technique-nasal-foreign-body-removal/

     

    Placing a small foley in the affected nares, past the obstruction, inflating the balloon, and then pulling back. This should dislodge the object. Balloon catheters may also be used to prevent posterior migration of a foreign body while other methods of removal are used.

     

    Mechanical retrieval with your ENT colleagues or with alligator forceps if you can see it.

     

    This reference reviews all techniques:  https://emj.bmj.com/content/17/2/91

     

    • Welcome! This is the website for the Mount Sinai Emergency Ultrasound Division. It serves as an information resource for residents, fellows, medical students and others seeking information about point-of-care ultrasound. There is a lot ofRead more

    • Bag Mask Ventilation During Intubation

      A few days ago NEJM published the results of an investigation with profound implications for our specialty.  A group of intensivists and anesthesiologists conducted a multicenter, randomized trial conducted in seven ICUs to study theRead more

    • Gastric Emptying for Acute Poisonings

      At the request of department leadership, we will be revisiting methods of gastric decontamination for today’s pearl.  Two methods in particular. Ipecac-induced emesis and gastric lavage are two procedures that we read about in medicalRead more

    • Pacemakers Review pt. 3

      Today we will review complications associated w/ implanted pacemakers that you may encounter in the ED and thus ought to be familiar with. Generally, complications can be divided into two categories: early vs. late EarlyRead more

    • Pacemakers Review Pt. 2

      Cardiac pacing as an intervention can be conceptualized as addressing problems in electrophysiological conduction and/or.  So, for example, if there is a disruption in the electrical continuity between the atrium and the ventricle, a pacerRead more

    • Pacemakers Review Pt. 1

      The pursuit of mastery over cardiovascular emergencies demands a rough familiarity with implanted devices which includes why they get implanted in the first place (indications), how they work, how they malfunction, and how they affectRead more

    • In honor of a rosh review question that I got wrong, lets review Lyme disease!   Lyme disease is caused by the spirochete Boriella burgdorferi, transmitted to humans through tick bites from ixodes ticks. Location:Read more

    • NGT INSERTION

      Your patient has an SBO and has repeated bilious emesis on the side. The surgery team is in the OR and they ask if you can place the nasogastric tube (NGT). Lets review proper NGTRead more

    • No, that’s not an olive. That’s Pyloric Stenosis!

      Inspired by what appears to have been a very interesting day in the Peds ED, lets review a rare but interesting pediatric entity: PYLORIC STENOSIS Background: MC in Males (5:1) & firstborn children (30%) UsuallyRead more

    NextPrevious