D-dimer for dissection?

    NextPrevious

    D-dimer for dissection?

    Aortic dissection continues to be one of the most difficult diagnoses to make. The IRAD study from 2009 found that a d-dimer <500 ng/mL used to rule out acute aortic dissection had a negative likelihood ratio of 0.07 in the first 24 hours, with a sensitivity of 96.6%. Check out the study here.  In terms of decision tools, the Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score (ADD-RS) is a validated clinical tool to help risk stratify low to moderate risk patients. Read about the ADD-RS here.

    One study, the ADvISED Trial, combined the use of d-dimer AND ADD-RS and, though not externally validated yet, showed some promising results. D dimer of <500ng/mL had sensitivity of 100% in ruling out dissection in patients with ADD-RS risk score of 0. Ultimately, ADD-RS risk score 0/≤1 plus d-dimer of <500 ng/mL accurately ruled out aortic dissection. Read the ADvISED Trial here.

    Consider using one of these tools (or both with caution) with your next low to moderate risk patient! Make it even easier and check out MdCalc.

    All the studies:

    Nazerian, Peiman, et al. “Diagnostic accuracy of the aortic dissection detection risk score plus D-dimer for acute aortic syndromes: the ADvISED Prospective Multicenter Study.” Circulation (2017): CIRCULATIONAHA-117.

    Rogers, Adam M., et al. “Sensitivity of the Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score, a Novel Guideline-Based Tool for Identification of Acute Aortic Dissection at Initial PresentationClinical Perspective: Results From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection.” Circulation123.20 (2011): 2213-2218.

    Suzuki, Toru, et al. “Diagnosis of acute aortic dissection by D-dimer: the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection Substudy on Biomarkers (IRAD-Bio) experience.” Circulation119.20 (2009): 2702-2707.

     

    • Welcome! This is the website for the Mount Sinai Emergency Ultrasound Division. It serves as an information resource for residents, fellows, medical students and others seeking information about point-of-care ultrasound. There is a lot ofRead more

    • Central Line Wizardry

      I was scrolling through twitter this morning when I came across a quick video from @CriticalCareNow for an awesome central line trick. And then I went to his feed and found some more. They areRead more

    • Let’s wait for the “official urinalysis”….?

      Chances are you order a urine dip or urinalysis on a good number of your patients each shift. But how good are these tests at helping us diagnose a urinary tract infection? The short answer:Read more

    • National Physician Suicide Awareness Day

      This past Tuesday (September 17th) was the first annual National Physician Suicide Awareness Day. CORD, ACEP, SAEM and a number of other EM organizations paired with organization from other specialties to raise awareness of theRead more

    • M is for morphine

      Remember MONA (morphine, oxygen, nitro, aspirin) from med school? Well, she may be just “A” now…. Over the years, all of these treatments (except for good old aspirin) have become somewhat controversial in the treatmentRead more

    • Meningitis Prophylaxis

      Have you ever taken care of really critical, undifferentiated patient, only later to find out that they were diagnosed with a serious, contagious illness? We are exposed to innumerable pathogens each day in the ED,Read more

    • The Betel Nut: an oral carcinogen

      Ever walk up to a stable, comfortable appearing patient at Elmhurst and their mouth/teeth are completely RED? Or maybe like a dark brownish/black color? Like this?? It really scared me the first I saw itRead more

    • The Fascia Iliaca compartment block: as magical as it sounds!

      In case you haven’t gotten to this month’s EM:RAP, there’s a really great segment on an important ED procedure that we definitely don’t do enough of in the ED: the nerve block. The section discussesRead more

    • Hurry Up & RUSH!

      You’re working in RESUS, and you get a notification for hypotension. He’s a 65 year old male noted to be hypotensive to 70/40 by EMS. On arrival, he’s altered and unable to provide any history,Read more

    NextPrevious