Clot or not: What are we going to do about PESIT?

    NextPrevious

    Clot or not: What are we going to do about PESIT?

    In October 2016, the Pulmonary Embolism in Syncope Italian Trial (PESIT) was published in the New England Journal of Medicine. Since its publication, it has generated a great deal of conversation and controversy.

     

    First, a brief rundown of the study:

    Its objective was to determine the prevalence of PE among patients older than 18 who were hospitalized for a first episode of syncope. Patients with previous syncopal episodes, those on anticoagulation therapy, or those who were pregnant were excluded. After eliminating patients who were excluded or did not consent, 560 admitted patients were included in the study. Each had a d-dimer and was evaluated with the Wells Score. Patients with a negative d-dimer and a low Wells Score (330 patients in all) were deemed to be low-risk for PE and had no further PE work-up. The other 230 patients had either CTA or ventilation-perfusion scanning. Of those tested, 97 had a confirmed PE. That’s 17.3% of the admitted cohort, and 42.2% of the admitted patients who were deemed high-risk enough to be tested.

     

    17.3% – that’s almost one in six! Do we need to CTA everyone who presents for syncope?

    No! Let’s look more closely at the data.

    • Remember that only admitted patients were evaluated for PE in this trial. During the study period, only 3.8% of all patients who visited the ED for syncope had a PE – that’s a lot less than 17.3%.
    • The characteristics that were significantly different between the admitted patients who had PE and those who did not (previous VTE, undetermined cause of syncope, RR > 20, HR > 100, SBP < 110, clinical signs of DVT, active cancer) would prompt us to consider PE anyway.
    • Finally, of the 72 PEs confirmed by CTA, 24 were segmental or sub-segmental. In these vessels, 25-50% of positive studies are actually false positives. Even if the PE is real, the clinical significance of a clot in one of these small vessels is unknown. Anticoagulation comes with its own serious risks – we don’t want to increase someone’s risk of ICH or other bleeding for a PE that doesn’t have any physiologic effect, or worse, that isn’t there at all.

     

    Some final thoughts:
    This study was well-run, but it’s easy to misunderstand its conclusions. PE should be on your differential diagnosis in a patient who syncopizes. However, if your careful history and physical exam are inconsistent with PE, don’t feel compelled to search for it based solely on this research.

     

    References:

    1. Prandoni P, Lensing AWA, Prins M, et al. Prevalence of pulmonary embolism among patients hospitalized for syncope. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(16):1524-31.
    2. http://rebelem.com/the-pesit-trial-do-all-patients-with-1st-time-syncope-need-a-pulmonary-embolism-workup/
    3. http://www.emlitofnote.com/?p=3640
    4. https://coreem.net/journal-reviews/pesit-study/
    5. https://emcrit.org/emnerd/the-case-of-the-incidental-bystander/
    6. http://pulmccm.org/main/2016/pulmonary-hypertension-review/pesit-investigators-pulmonary-embolus-incidence-hospitalized-following-first-syncope/

     

    • Welcome! This is the website for the Mount Sinai Emergency Ultrasound Division. It serves as an information resource for residents, fellows, medical students and others seeking information about point-of-care ultrasound. There is a lot ofRead more

    • renal handling of water

      If you were on a tea & toast diet, how much water would you need to drink before you develop hyponatremia? I haven’t seen anyone work out the numbers before so here are my calculations. AndRead more

    • acute acidemia physiology

      As alluded to in the first post, don’t be fooled by a “normal” potassium in the setting of DKA because osmotic diuresis and H+/K+ exchange means that total body potassium is actually LOW. You all knowRead more

    • renal handling of potassium

      the first symptom of hyperkalemia is death Earlier post covered temporizing measures to counter hyperkalemia — namely, intracellular shift, increasing cardiac myocyte threshold potential. Give furosemide if the patient still urinates and consider dialysis, but then askRead more

    • bicarbonate revisited

      Previous post reviewed the safety of balanced crystalloids in hyper K. But what was up with serum bicarbonate decreasing with saline administration? This post introduces a new way of looking at the anion gap to possiblyRead more

    • hyperkalemia and balanced crystalloids

      Is it safe to give LR or plasmalyte to a hyperkalemic patient (these balanced crystalloids have 4-5 mEq/L K as opposed to 0 mEq/L K in normal saline)? Postponing the discussion of renal handling of potassium toRead more

    • hyperkalemia physiology

      You’ll likely encounter hyperkalemia on your next Resus / Cardiac shift, and you’ll instinctively treat it. But take a moment to review the fascinating physiology behind the “cocktail”! First, consider how K+ is buffered byRead more

    • Slow down your tachycardia (but not really)

      You’re sitting in resus bemoaning the departure of your most beloved attending when suddenly a patient wheels in without warning. The patient looks relatively stable but the triage RN tells you her heart rate wasRead more

    • Otitis externa: use the ear wick!

      Acute otitis externa (AOE) is a common complaint seen in pediatric as well as adult emergency departments. AOE is typically not accompanied by acute otitis media, although concurrent cases are possible. Also called “swimmer’s ear”Read more

    NextPrevious